Built on shift, not in a boardroom

Record. Go.

Watch chaos get shocked back into rhythm.

tebIQ was built by Dr. Mohammad Chelehmalzadeh, an ER physician, one pain point at a time.

Multiple patients on one recording. Simultaneous addendums, signouts, and supervisory notes. Your note on one side, AI looking up alternatives on the other — you never leave your workspace.

85,677 charts · 25 months · two-hospital pilot

Critical-care capture. Measured.

Clinicians using tebIQ8.2% → 12.1% of encounters

+48%

Colleagues, same EDs9.3% → 10.2%

+10%

Our analysis of the coding vendor's own monthly reports — third-party data, not self-reported · p = 0.0009 (unweighted permutation test) · result holds with the founder's own charts excluded · not self-reported.

The numbers that matter

+0%

critical-care capture for clinicians using tebIQ — while colleagues in the same EDs moved +10%.

charts analysed over 25 months. Not a survey. Not a testimonial. A coding vendor's own reports.

Not just more critical care.
Measurably better documentation.

CT interpretation+11.5

External-provider discussion+5.2

External records reviewed+3.5

The exact elements a certified coder coaches every month — finally happening at the bedside. Colleagues moved +0.7, +1.5 and −3.2 on the same measures.

Every line is a clinician

Nine of ten improved.

Physician A+7.0

PA B+6.1

Physician C+5.8

Physician D+4.7

Physician E+3.8

PA F+2.2

PA G+2.2

Physician H+2.0

PA I+1.8

Physician J−0.4

Percentage-point change in critical-care share of encounters, pre → post adoption. Anonymised. Physician J entered with the group's highest baseline — we show the flat line too. That's the point.

Not upcoding. Reclassification.

Colleagues (no tebIQ)

99285 share▲ +2.9

99291 critical care▼ −0.8

→

tebIQ users

99285 share▬ −0.3

99291 critical care▲ +3.5

The same sick patients — documented to CPT's critical-care standard, and paid as such. With the audit trail to prove it.

Start free — judge it against your own coding report